Международный научный вестник2782-384910.24412/2782-3849-2026-3-366-371OtherРоль электронного мониторинга в европейских системах уголовного правосудияThe role of electronic monitoring in european criminal justice systemsПырченковаГалина СтепановнаPyrchenkovaGalina Stepanovnagalapyrchenkova@mail.ruAssociate Professor of the Foreign Languages Department of the Academy of Management of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, Candidate of Philological Sciences, Associate Professorдоцент кафедры иностранных языков Академии управления МВД России, кандидат филологических наук, доцент1504202633663711603202607042026

Статья рассматривает роль электронного мониторинга в качестве альтернативной формы наказания в уголовном правосудии европейских стран. Выявлена тенденция растущего распространения и многофункционального использования электронного мониторинга в процессе досудебного разбирательства, при вынесении и при исполнении приговора. Анализируются общие черты и различия моделей электронного мониторинга, действующие в Европе. Отмечается необходимость учета критериев риска при назначении этой альтернативы тюремному заключению. Автор приходит к выводу, что в любом случае электронный мониторинг должен способствовать уменьшению роста числа заключенных, стабилизации механизмов самоконтроля и, следовательно, снижению уровня рецидивизма.

This article examines the role of electronic monitoring as an alternative form of punishment in European criminal justice systems. A trend toward the increasing multifunctional use of electronic monitoring during pre-trial proceedings, sentencing, and enforcement is identified. The common features and differences between electronic monitoring models in use in Europe are analyzed. The need to consider risk criteria when assigning this alternative to imprisonment is emphasized. The author concludes that, in any case, electronic monitoring should contribute to reducing the growth of prison populations, stabilizing self-control mechanisms, and, consequently, reducing recidivism rates.

электронный мониторингуголовное правосудиеальтернативные формы наказаниятюремное заключениекритерии рискаelectronic monitoringcriminal justicealternative forms of punishmentimprisonmentrisk criteriaBishop, N., Schneider, U. Improving the Implementation of the European Rules on Community Sanctions and Measures: Introduction to a New Council of Europe Recommendation. – European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, v. 9, 2001. – PP. 180-192.Mortimer, E., May, Ch. Electronic monitoring in practice: the second year of the trials of curfew orders. – London: Home Office 1997.Ministry of Justice: Electronic Monitoring. – The Hague 1996.Albrecht H., Electronic Monitoring in Europe: a summary and assessment of recent developments in the legal framework and implementation of electronic monitoring. – Electronic Monitoring: Report on the 4th Conference, 19-21 May 2005. [5]Mayer, M., Haferkamp, R., Levy, R. (Eds.). Will Electronic Monitoring Have a Future in Europe? – Freiburg, 2003.Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights of the Council of Europe on the Situation of European Prisons and Pre-trial Detention Centres. – Doc. 10097, 19 February, 2004.Albrecht, H.-J.: The Place of Electronic Monitoring in the Development of Criminal Punishment and Systems of Sanction. – Mayer, M., Haferkamp, R., Levy, R. (Eds.): Will Electronic Monitoring Have a Future in Europe? – Freiburg, 2003. – PP. 249-264.Boelens, R.: Electronic Monitoring in The Netherlands. – Mayer, M., Haverkamp, R., Levy, R.: (eds): Will Electronic Monitoring Have a Future in Europe? – Freiburg, 2002. – PP. 81-88.Van Kalmthout, A., Tak, P. New Sanctions Proliferating in The Netherlands. – Overcrowded Times 11, 1999.Whitfield, D. Tackling the Tag. The Electronic Monitoring of Offenders. –Winchester, 1997.Haverkamp, R., Mayer, M., Levy, R.: Will Electronic Monitoring Have a Future in Europe? – Mayer, M., Haverkamp, R., Levy, R. (eds.): Will Electronic Monitoring Have a Future in Europe? – Freiburg, 2003. – PP. 1-12. [12]Dodgson, K., Goodwin, P., Howard, P., Llewellyn-Thomas, S., Mortimer, E., Russell, N., Weiner, M.: Electronic monitoring of released prisoners: an evaluation of the Home Detention Curfew scheme. – Home Office Research Study 222, Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate, 2001.Bishop, N., Schneider, U. Improving the Implementation of the European Rules on Community Sanctions and Measures: Introduction to a New Council of Europe Recommendation. – European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, v. 9, 2001. – PP. 180-192.Mortimer, E., May, Ch. Electronic monitoring in practice: the second year of the trials of curfew orders. – London: Home Office 1997.Ministry of Justice: Electronic Monitoring. – The Hague 1996.Albrecht H., Electronic Monitoring in Europe: a summary and assessment of recent developments in the legal framework and implementation of electronic monitoring. – Electronic Monitoring: Report on the 4th Conference, 19-21 May 2005. [5]Mayer, M., Haferkamp, R., Levy, R. (Eds.). Will Electronic Monitoring Have a Future in Europe? – Freiburg, 2003.Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights of the Council of Europe on the Situation of European Prisons and Pre-trial Detention Centres. – Doc. 10097, 19 February, 2004.Albrecht, H.-J.: The Place of Electronic Monitoring in the Development of Criminal Punishment and Systems of Sanction. – Mayer, M., Haferkamp, R., Levy, R. (Eds.): Will Electronic Monitoring Have a Future in Europe? – Freiburg, 2003. – PP. 249- 264.Boelens, R.: Electronic Monitoring in The Netherlands. – Mayer, M., Haverkamp, R., Levy, R.: (eds): Will Electronic Monitoring Have a Future in Europe? – Freiburg, 2002. – PP. 81-88.Van Kalmthout, A., Tak, P. New Sanctions Proliferating in The Netherlands. – Overcrowded Times 11, 1999.Whitfield, D. Tackling the Tag. The Electronic Monitoring of Offenders. –Winchester, 1997.Haverkamp, R., Mayer, M., Levy, R.: Will Electronic Monitoring Have a Future in Europe? – Mayer, M., Haverkamp, R., Levy, R. (eds.): Will Electronic Monitoring Have a Future in Europe? –Freiburg, 2003. – PP. 1-12. [12]Dodgson, K., Goodwin, P., Howard, P., Llewellyn-Thomas, S., Mortimer, E., Russell, N., Weiner, M.: Electronic monitoring of released prisoners: an evaluation of the Home Detention Curfew scheme. – Home Office Research Study 222, Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate, 2001.